<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Neurolaw - The Brain On The Stand</title>
        <link>http://aldoushuxley.yuku.com/topic/369/t/Neurolaw-The-Brain-On-The-Stand.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Can we be held accountable for our proclivities or even our thoughts?  This NY Times magazine article explores this issue.  This is definitely an area of the justice system that needs to be monitored going forward.  Here are two excerpts:Quote:The idea of holding people accountable for their predispositions rather than their actions poses a challenge to one of the central principles of Anglo-American jurisprudence: namely, that people are responsible for their behavior, not their proclivities... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:58:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Neurolaw - The Brain On The Stand ]]></title>
			<link>http://aldoushuxley.yuku.com/reply/11/t/Neurolaw-The-Brain-On-The-Stand.html#reply-11</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Interesting.<br><br>There was an article in The Economist supporting the idea of morality being biologically inherent to humans as well as asking why.<br><br>I have not much to contribute beyond that, as this is an idea I've personally been struggling with for a number of years. I usually phrase in far more facile terms: &quot;can we blame people for their natures?&quot;.<br><br>I'll be watching this thread closely. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (tepid dishwater)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://aldoushuxley.yuku.com/sreply/11</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:58:29 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Neurolaw - The Brain On The Stand ]]></title>
			<link>http://aldoushuxley.yuku.com/topic/369/t/Neurolaw-The-Brain-On-The-Stand.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Can we be held accountable for our proclivities or even our thoughts?  This <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/magazine/11Neurolaw.t.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1173918106-5XOJ2aLu+Zi2bgs+R8I3ZQ&amp;pagewanted=all">NY Times magazine article</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> explores this issue.  This is definitely an area of the justice system that needs to be monitored going forward.  Here are two excerpts:<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br><br>The idea of holding people accountable for their predispositions rather than their actions poses a challenge to one of the central principles of Anglo-American jurisprudence: namely, that people are responsible for their behavior, not their proclivities  for what they do, not what they think. Were going to have to make a decision about the skull as a privacy domain, Wolpe says. Indeed, Wolpe serves on the board of an organization called the Center for... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (somaweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://aldoushuxley.yuku.com/topic/369</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:31:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>